Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and the Dilemma of Bilingual Education124

The question of whether Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and other Chinese cities should adopt English as the medium of instruction in higher education has sparked intense debate in recent years. Proponents argue that English-medium instruction (EMI) can enhance students' global competitiveness, while opponents express concerns about the potential negative impact on students' Chinese language proficiency and cultural identity.

The Case for EMI

Those who advocate for EMI in Hong Kong and Shenzhen point to the global dominance of English as the language of business, academia, and diplomacy. They argue that by teaching students in English, universities can prepare them for success in an increasingly interconnected world. EMI proponents also claim that English-medium instruction can improve students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as well as their ability to communicate effectively with people from different cultures.

Concerns about EMI

Opponents of EMI raise several concerns about its potential impact on students' Chinese language proficiency. They argue that students who receive their education primarily in English may struggle to develop the same level of proficiency in Chinese as their peers who receive their education in Chinese. This could have negative consequences for students' ability to participate fully in Chinese society and culture.

In addition, critics of EMI express concerns about its potential impact on students' cultural identity. They argue that by teaching students in English, universities may be sending the message that Chinese is not a worthy or valuable language. This could lead to a loss of cultural pride and a sense of alienation from Chinese culture and traditions.

Another concern raised by opponents of EMI is that it may exacerbate existing inequalities in education. Students from wealthy families who have access to English-language instruction outside of school may have an advantage over students from less privileged backgrounds who do not have the same opportunities. This could lead to a widening gap in educational attainment and opportunity.

The Way Forward

The debate over EMI in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and other Chinese cities is a complex one with no easy answers. There are valid arguments to be made on both sides of the issue. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to adopt EMI is a difficult one that must be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific needs and circumstances of each institution and student body.

However, it is important to note that EMI is not a panacea for all of the challenges facing higher education in Hong Kong and Shenzhen. There are a number of other factors that need to be addressed, including the quality of teaching, the curriculum, and the assessment system. EMI can be a valuable tool for improving the quality of higher education in these cities, but it is only one part of the solution.

2024-11-16

Previous：English Language Learning Studio: Empowering Students with Linguistic Prowess

Next：Liu Yifei‘s English Proficiency: An Evaluation